The
on-going rift between the Government of Tanzania and owners of private
schools over the government’s decision to regulate and dictate tuition
and other fees charged by private schools in the country calls for an
urgent need on the part of the government and parliament to re-assess
and re-define the role of government in private education.
Without
denying the fact that regulation is crucial to enforcing government
policy designed at meeting specific goals, there are now strong
indications that the government’s decision to dictate fees and other
charges by the private schools and institutions of higher learning will
only do more harm than good.
On the
outset, an apparent goal of such a policy is to make private education
more accessible to the masses but a critical assessment of such a policy
and the current approach only suggest that such a stance will only lead
to making the sector unattractive and unjustifiable from investment
perspective which will potentially lead to depriving Tanzanians of that
alternative. The broader implication is the potential diminishing of
Tanzania’s reputation as a preferred investment destination of choice in
the region. One fact is obvious, no private investor is going to offer
quality education without a decent return on investment.
Cost
of service delivery significantly varies from school to school depending
on factors such as what the school offers in terms of academics and
extra curriculum activities, standard of facilities, strategy on staff
recruitment and retention and so on, this is a universal reality. The
decision by the government to come up with nation-wide fees completely
contradicts this reality and only creates an environment that encourages
private schools to focus on cost cutting at the expense of quality
education.
With
the emergence of a growing Tanzanian middle class, families are willing
and able to pay a premium for quality education. The government needs to
accept the fact that Tanzanians are capable of making rational
decisions and comparisons on whether or not fee charged by the private
schools are justified or otherwise. Depriving parents of such an option
will only encourage parents who believe in investing in quality
education to send their children to neighboring countries, a decision
that could cost the country not only revenues going into the sector but
also talent because upon graduation companies are quick at grabbing
employees from top notch schools.
On
building contributions charged by schools, the education Minister
questioned the justification of imposing such fees arguing that if
schools are issued with a license it implies that they already have a
building. Owning a building does not necessarily mean that it is free of
any encumbrances such as rent, mortgage or an expectation of a
reasonable return to investors. Even in the developed countries it is
normal for jurisdictions that run government owned schools to charge an
extra tax aimed at paying off financial obligations tied to buildings,
the tax alternative for the private sector is obviously fee. The
government’s reputation as a facilitator of private investment is
seriously impaired when an official at cabinet level makes such remarks
which are fundamentally flawed from financing standpoint. Such comments
only manifest and reinforce a hostile attitude.
One of
the most profound challenges facing investors considering Africa as an
investment destination, Tanzania included, is unpredictability of the
political and business environment. This position will only cause local
and foreign investors to be inclined towards investing in projects with a
short-term outlook at the expenses of long-term projects that come with
a long term tax base. Long term development calls for long term
investments and long term investments is feasible if the government is
fairly stable on matters that have a huge impact on investor
bottom-line.
There
is no lasting political gain out of such a hostile policy even though in
the short term citizens might be led into thinking that such a policy
translates into more accessibility for the masses, in the long run no
investor will provide any service at a loss. There is no political
incorrectness by accepting the fact that some people will afford private
education and others will not, this is the reality even in the
developed world. A meaningful solution to our education crisis will be
achieved when the government focuses on coming up with programs that
improve the quality of public education that empowers Tanzanians to
compete on the global marketplace, make public education more accessible
and find strategies to contain the cost of service delivery per
student, while at the same time work with the private sector to offer an
alternative.
In the
developed countries today, the partnership between some governments and
the private education providers is in such harmony that governments
come up with plans to supplement the private sector, this is because
such governments recognize their fundamental obligation to educate its
citizens regardless of what schools they choose to attend. For example,
communities can set up charter schools fully funded by tax revenues,
voucher systems that mandate governments to pay non-government schools a
pre-determined formula per student enrolled into those schools, this is
basically a business model in which governments fulfill their minimum
obligation to its citizens and allow schools to charge for extras, in
some cases tax payers get to choose to what schools they want they taxes
allocated. An explicit feature of all these examples is the flow of
public funds to the private sector. The feasibility of such programs in a
country like Tanzania is debatable but the least that the Tanzanian
government can do is not to frustrate the private sector.
As
things stand today, it would make a lot of sense for the Government to
invite the private sector to the negotiating table not only to discuss
the indicative fees but to objectively contemplate the merit of such a
policy in the first place. By doing so the government will demonstrate
that it listens and considers investors in the private education sector
as true development partners. Investors assess the environment by
looking at how the government handles testing situations and not what
the government claims when promoting Tanzania as an investment
destination of choice.
Hassan Saudin
hsaudin@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment