Hydrogen
(H2) combines explosively with oxygen (O2) to form water (H2O). The
reaction is exothermic, in other words it releases energy. Hydrogen and
oxygen have therefore been used as rocket fuel for decades, not because
of a benefit to the environment but because the full weight of the fuel
is ignited. That the process is clean-burning suggested to some, back in
the 1990s, that it would be environmentally friendly to expand its use
as a car fuel as well. Though the idea was quickly dismissed on
scientific grounds, the idea has experienced a rebirth in recent years.
Common Misconception
Proponents
of hydrogen as a fuel believe that a switch from hydrocarbons to
hydrogen fuel is advantageous to the environment. Specifically, they
tout the cleanliness with which hydrogen burns, producing only energy
and water. This however, ignores the production end, which is highly
pollutant.
Hydrogen Production
About
95 percent of the hydrogen currently produced in the United States
comes from natural gas processing called “steam methane reforming.”
Although the process uses natural gas, production creates a great deal
of CO2--the opposite of the impression proponents of hydrogen fuel give.
Other Hydrogen Production
The
separation of hydrogen and oxygen by hydrolysis (using electricity) is
much less popular than steam methane reforming because it is so
inefficient; only about 70 percent. According to the documentary “Who
Killed the Electric Car?” a fuel cell car powered by hydrogen made with
electricity uses three to four times more energy than a car powered by
batteries. This difference is expected to widen as battery technology
continues to improve.
Ozone
Hydrogen
leakage can occur during many steps of its production and use. Science
Magazine reported in June 2003 that hydrogen leakage from widespread use
of hydrogen fuel would gobble up ozone faster than CFCs do.
Chlorofluorocarbons are banned worldwide to prevent deterioration of the
protective ozone layer.
Politics
Hydrogen
cars further hurt the environment by distracting from the far greater
efficiency of electric cars. Research engineer Wally Rippel of
AeroVironment put forth the argument that GM and Shell are pushing forth
hydrogen fuel cells as a way to distract the public with a technology
that is too far in the future to hurt current demand--and therefore acts
to preserve the status quo. In contrast, U.S. Energy Secretary and
Nobelist Steven Chu has called for the cancellation of all of the $100M
in his DoE budget for hydrogen fuel cell research.
Mitigation
Two
possibilities that researchers are pursuing to salvage hydrogen as an
environment-friendly fuel are as follows. Argonne National Lab is
studying CO2 capture during the steam methane reforming process. And
researchers in Australia are working on a solar-driven residential
hydrogen pump--creating hydrogen fuel by hydrolysis using photovoltaics
on one’s own garage roof.
No comments:
Post a Comment